Medieval Battle Tactics Essay -- History Battles Weapons Essays

medieval Battle Tactics knightly tactics were requisite for an attack or siege of a castle. Many tactics and strategies helped develop much-improved version of an attacking artifact, like weapons and sieging machinery. The knights of Medieval England which were the cavalry, improved as the years went by, only if never actually had any tactics or strategies. The usual knight would just go out on that point and fight. The knights were the counter offensive against a piddling siege, but they were ineffective against a large siege of a castle. A siege was very essential for medieval warfare. Siege was like the most cardinal part of an attack that is if youre attacking a castle. As you know no one inhabited New England back then in the Medieval Ages, so many nations were competing for it. One of them was Rome. Rome inhabited New England first, and as being the first settlers they left some of their customs, which among them was the key to war. The Roman legion imperturbable of a hug e amount of infantry and some cavalry was an substantial factor in Roman War. However, if Rome and England were compared then the cavalry of Rome posterior developed into the Knight. The well trained infantry of Romes legion for attacking and invading now was set to defend in Medieval England as it more compares to the castle. Now that you know some about the origination of the Knight and the castle, lets get into the tactics used by the land units of Medieval England like the knight and the archers.The knight, being the cavalry of the castle, and also the last line of defense between invaders and the castle, were inferior to a well trained army of arse soldiers. Usually, it was the knights ability and bravery decided the medieval battle. The Medieval Knight was trained from childhood. However, they were never taught any strategies. So, when it came to fighting in the battlefield, they used a guerilla warfare method where they would engage the enemy. This was nothing like the dis ciplined lines of musket men (soldiers with rifles) of the later British but rather just went out there and everyone fought on their own like a free hand anything goes melee match. When traveling, the medieval knight traveled in a group, however the group was unaffixed to attacks because it was not arranged in a strategic way. Soon the knights, who had superior life, and had an advantage towards a one on ... ...troying the defenders buildings.The Trebuchet, on the opposite hand, was the biggest of all the siege weapons. Trebuchet lives up to its name meaning slinging machine. The trebuchet had a long arm that had a big end so that the end would help it repulse when released. The arm was buckled down to one side, while the big end would hang in the air until the buckle was released. At the assoil of the arm you would find a sling with a rock inside. When the buckle was released there were usually soldiers at the other side with ropes attached to the weight, and helping it propel by pulling the ropes.England came a long way from just plain foot soldiers with minimal padding, to armored knights and siege weapons. Perhaps it was because Feudalism must seduce affected the way that the medieval forces were and developed along the medieval era of England. Medieval War and War Tactics played a very important role in medieval life because it helped shape approaching generations of empires. With out war in the medieval ages of England, they would have probably not been prepared for their future role in war among other countries focusing on conquest and expansion of other parts of the world.