Fundamental Assumptions Of The Human Nature Politics Essay

Fundamental Assumptions Of The Human Nature Politics EssayThe radical assumptions about world constitution have played a major(ip) role in determining the philosophy of life for many state. In f knead, the manner in which various societies atomic number 18 organized politic alone toldy, soci aloney as head up as economically has a great dependence on basic assumptions on kind temper. There argon diverse theories on how societies are organized based on assumptions towards valet nature. Actually, all these theories are composed of assumptions on the preferences of serviceman beings. There are various interlocking problems facing the modern world and whose solutions solely reside in the assumptions that are do by policy makers concerning valet de chambre race nature. The assumptions on merciful nature have elicited diverse reactions and views from different people (Rifkin 2009). As much(prenominal), people have had varied preferences on the best and acceptable degre e of organization for their societies. The world leaders apply different forms of governance depending on the assumptions they present towards human nature.Governance based on human nature assumptions is an antediluvian patriarch principle spanning over 200 years ago. As a issuance of fact, assumptions on human behavior thunder mug be traced to the enlightenment flow (Turner 2006). This is the time when the concept of modern market was born and also the consequence of a state era nation. During the period of enlightenment, various thinkers such as the John Locke, Marquis de Condorcet, Adam Smith and other philosophers had their indignation on the views expressed by the Christian faith of the medieval period that human nature was depraved and fallen. Similarly, the same faith viewed humans as pursuance the grace of God for salvation in the world to come. Consequently, these philosophers sought to retrieve that human nature contained ego-reliance, rationality, as well as ut ilitarianism. Moreover, they proposed that human nature obtained salvation in the sensible acquisition obtained during their lifetime.The enlightenment thought specimen has had immense impacts on peoples perception of human nature and their preferred nation-state. The principal(prenominal) focus of the nation state is the protection of property as well as the maintenance of citizen interests in all endeavors. Based on assumptions on the autonomy of human beings, nation states have been created. Thus the motif for material acquisition and attainment of salvation to human nature has brought about the perpetuation of economic activities (Rifkin 2009). For instance, roughly of the modern nations embrace the view of human autonomy and search for unmarried growth. On the other hand, assumptions that human nature is capable on the supernatural beings may bring about a form of governance that vests powers and privileges on a chosen intermediary. Such regimens include the all-power ful monarchies which represent the divine will in governance.Positive assumptions on human nature can promote effective governance. The modern fraternity regards individual success and advancement with high esteem. Such assumptions make it justifiable for self governance (Turner 2006). The government is thitherfore justified to maintain the rules and regulations aimed at maintaining the agree order. In spite of the shortcomings found in any form of governance, remarkable improvements can be done by embracing proper and coiffe assumptions on human nature. Additionally, immense success in governance can be attained through the embrace of new generation port of leadership. For instance, with the increased internal interrelationships, it is imperative for the government to take into account the biosphere governance which is a collaborative functioning of nations, regions as well as localities all embedded by similar governance and demands.Essay no.3The federal official government h as the overall power and authority over all agencies. In fact, the federal government mandates the state offices to perform specific tasks in accordance to the requirements of their defining and governance. On their own, the federal agencies may not perform effectively. They derive all authority and power from the radical Acts that led to their formation and governance. Most importantly, in that respect are essential requirements for the operation of the state agencies within such Acts (Ducat 2008). Therefore, the consequence to which the federal agencies act and make rules and regulations is dependent upon the legality of the mandate by the federal government. The Supreme Court is mandated by the constitution to oversee all the legal activities of the federal government alongside the different federal agencies. As such, the regulations and rules applied by the agencies need to obtain approval of the Supreme Court. Moreover, there cannot be rules and regulations on how federal agencies are to be rum without a nod from the Supreme Court (Ducat 2008). The entire process is supposed to be carried out through consultation with the federal built-in requirements.The federal agencies are regarded as being independent regulatory offices. The functioning of the various Federal agencies and offices is facilitated by the congressional financial appropriation towards such agencies. Consequently, the relevance of the rules and regulations made by these agencies has to be determined by the congressional as well as constitutional requirements. The enforcement of the rules and regulations made by the Federal agencies in the Courts as laws has to dependent solely on the requirements of the Constitution (United States Office of Education 2010). For instance, an mode such as the Federal Communications Commission was formed by the Communications Act of 1934 and it enjoys its independence based on the Federal constitutional requirements. Moreover, the agency boasts of imme nse power and authority to make rules and regulations within its constitutional requirements. The powers and responsibilities of the commissioners mandated to govern these Agencies are clearly enumerated in the Acts. For example in the national of the FCC, there are various titles of the 1934 Act on its formation that take different requirements of the agency. In fact, the first Title reelects the description of the administration, formation as well as powers of the FCC. The Act also clarifies the process of selection and hiring of the commissioners supercharged with the responsibility of manning the Commission (United States Office of Education 2010).The applicability and constitutionality of the rules and regulations made by Federal agencies and offices into laws in the courts depends on the Act on their formation. For example, the Acts tend to give a general functioning of the Agencies and their formation. However, there are specific issues that are left for the agencies to a ccomplish. Therefore, when the agencies narrow down the requirements of their formation, they are required to come up with rules and regulations on their functioning (Ducat 2008). Such rules and regulations need to be recognized by the courts. Nevertheless, the courts may fail to recognize such rules and regulations as laws under any(prenominal) conditions such as violation of certain federal laws or when the agencies act beyond their constitutional requirements.Section B essay no. 1The debate on human nature and governance has had diverse discussions and propositions from some(prenominal) philosophers. For instance, philosophers such as John Locke and Friedrich Nietzsche have had diverse ideas and focus towards human nature (Andrew 1999). The two philosophers have delved in various areas of interest depending on the circumstances during their time and the preferences of their studies. Nevertheless, there are pertinent issues that tend to affiliate their works based on human natu re. Moreover, these philosophers were interested in sympathy the working of the society with man as the main center of focus.From the location presented by John Locke, there are various factors that make human beings equal irrespective of the circumstances that entangle them. According to John Locke, there are various factors that bring about differences in views on faith and other issues in life. However, it is crucial that the differences are addressed in such a way as to promote better and harmonious relations among all men (Rifkin 2009). Furthermore, John Locke admits the existence of diversified views about worship and ways of life with each type adopting originality and superiority of beliefs. However, John Locke defends the impressiveness of embracing tolerance towards the diversified views. Similarly, Locke proposed the enormousness of shunning the transmission of person-to-person views and beliefs by elected representatives and embracing independence. Thus for him, h uman equity need to be the guiding principle for the maintenance of a civil society that enables human beings to thrive on individual basis.On the contrary, Friedrich Nietzsches perception of human beings on inequality is based on his immediate circumstances and beliefs. In fact, the views presented by Nietzsche about human beings leaves a lot to be desired. For instance, the claim that illusion tend to satisfy human intellect in most of the time shows how diabolical his views are. Similarly, Nietzsche dismisses the existence of rationality among men as the carry into truth (Andrew 1999). Surprisingly, he makes a proposition that deception forms the basis of human beliefs. The harsh presentation of human nature by Nietzsche does not divulge the square(a) nature of man. For instance, the claims in Nietzsches perspective seem distorted and presenting a negative view on life in general and human beings in particular. On the other hand, Lockes views tend to place major importance on human capability and potential of self-determination. Lockes perspective presents a true account of man and his pursuit of better end.