Japan and Korea Essay -- History Historical Korea Japan Essays

japan and KoreaDid Japan modernize or exploit Korea? Scholars throw debated this question with vigor throughout this century. I do non remember the answer is so black and white. While looking at the account statement of the village, evidence of both should appear. The word colonization al unitary generally fashion to move into a nonher peoples land and exploit resources. However, haughty results can appear during a negative situation.Regardless of what vertex of vox populi an individual takes, there is no doubt that Japan has dramatically influenced Korea. This is green with most nations in the industrialization finish or the modernization period. retrieve about it, every treaty endorsed between nations leads to policy change. The lessons learned from front agreements, aid in creating new policies.Korea, suggested by Cummings, was a buffer partition off between chinaw atomic number 18 and Japan. China acted as the big brother or role model for Korea. Culture, language v alues and society itself developed by free choices made by the Korean government. However, China was always do to step in if Korea seemed to get to sourceful or weak. Cummings makes this race sound as if everything was all right as long as Korea depended on the aid of China and respected Chinas self-assurance of the region. Japan although at multiplication respected Chinas power believed that if Korea would consider themselves equal to China Japan could take the role of the regional superpower. Japan also, at times thought they were superior to both China and Japan and should incorpo localise them both into the Japanese empire and at times had been fairly successful in dong so.Many factors allowed the Japanese colonization of Korea. For one, Korea had adopted an isolationist philosophy early in its history. Cummings has say many times that when you landed in Korea the first question asked was when are you leaving? In addition, Korean tradition did not place a high value on trad e. Cummings went on to say that Korea was the scarcely place that when a profit was made, it was not a joyous occasion. Do not be misled by that statement that would leave one to commend that Korean people were inferior and should be exploited, for I do not believe that at all. The Confucianism heritage did not believe in profit. However, equitability was not forbiddened. Such led to the tributary and cultural exchanges between Korea and China. These beliefs... ...er Japanese control, as well as to keep Korea profitable for Japan.Did Japan modernize Korea? zero(prenominal) Did the Japanese aid in the beginning of Koreas industrialization period? Yes, the infrastructure and technology forced upon Korea definitely gave the Korean people a foundation to industrialization.The problem I have in saying that Japan modernized Korea is that modernization in general has a positive connotation. I do not want to execute a victim to the cliches of one race blaming another for certain hardsh ips. However, I propose this question, Did the Japanese line of credit lead to positive modernization of Korea or the divisiveness that has haunted Korea for almost fifty years?I will not say that if Japan did not invade Korea that Korea would be unified today, or am I impulsive to say that another country would not have tried to colonize Korea. I do believe that Korea when their society was ready would have mobilized themselves to become an industrialized nation. I also believe that when they would have come to that point that they would have enjoyed the same type of success in growth rate that was present from the late 1960s. The only difference is when would Korea start.