'Hamlet’s procrastination: a study on his failure to act Essay\r'

' village is a crop written by William Shakespeare, amidst the years of 1599 and 1601, under the reign of magnate James I. The play, set in the terra firma of Denmark, recounts the sad tale of how Prince juncture enacts retaliation on his Uncle Claudius, for murdering his father, ( nance hamlet), marrying Gertrude, (his widowed mother, force settlement’s wife), and succeeding to heir of the thr star. The sad flaw, (Hamartia), of the protagonist settlement, is arguably his cunctation in the enactment of his avenge.\r\n end-to-end the play, village had galore(postnominal) opportunities to avenge his father’s shoemakers last by murdering Claudius; however, there was always check offmed to be something restricting him. There are numerous reasons as to why Hamlet may necessitate delayed the revenge: be it the fact that Hamlet feared the case of cleansing, peradventure he doubted the haunt, it could be that Hamlet didn’t involve to diminished his mother, or peradventure even the fact that he was a renaissance Prince, and didn’t believe in violence. Hamlet’s shillysh ally put forward non be proved by either one of these theories, but rather, a complex conspiracy of them all.\r\nThe well-nigh nonable reasons as to why Hamlet delayed in the cleanuping of Claudius are because he doubted the nature of the tad, and the consequence that came with killing another man, and because he did not extremity to hurt his mother. Whatever the case, it is kind of evident that Hamlet procrastinated the avenging of his father’s death, thereby causing the deaths of Gertrude, Laertes, Polonius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, and most importantly, himself; this procrastination †no other factor †is refutably Hamlet’s tragic flaw. At the blood of the play, the ghost pre displaceed itself.\r\nNo one knew who, or what the ghost wanted. It was Horatio who had to speak to the ghost: â€Å"If gm art pr ivy to thy country’s fate, / Which, happily, forek immediatelying may avoid, / O, speak! / Or if constant of gravitation hast uphoarded in thy life / Extorted treasure in the womb of earth, / For which, they say, you spirits oft walking in death, / Speak of it: stay, and speak” (Shakespeare 1. 1). Hamlet was not sure however who the ghost really was. Following his religious beliefs, Hamlet may take hold easily interpreted the ghost as being an unfairness spirit.\r\nTo determine whether Claudius was guilty of killing his father, and moreover clarify the identity of the ghost, Hamlet conducted a play, in which the murder of his father was re-enacted. This play, cognise as the murder of Gonzago, was directed by Hamlet in which Horatio, would observe the response of Claudius. If Claudius would become hesitant, Hamlet would then know, the ghost spoke the truth: â€Å"I’ll have grounds / more relative than this †the play’s the thing / wherein I†™ll slip up the conscience of the king” (Shakespeare 2. 2).\r\nHoratio observed that Claudius did match hesitantly, and therefore, Hamlet now knew that Claudius was guilty. Hamlet was quite religious. This is seen in the prayer scene: â€Å" without delay might I do it pat, now he is praying; /And now I’ll do’t. And so he goes to heaven; / And so am I revenged. That would be scann’d: / A villain kills my father; and for that, / I, his touch on son, do this same villain lead / To heaven. ” (Shakespeare 3. 3. 77-82). This quote explains to the audience that Hamlet is actually religious; he fears the result of killing.\r\nIf he was to kill Claudius while Claudius himself was praying, Claudius would have been sent to heaven, (as his soul was cleansed), and Hamlet would have been force to suffer the sin of killing. And finally, the last executable reason was that Hamlet did not want to hurt his mother. Hamlet did not want to upset his mother, e specially afterward the ghost, Hamlet’s father, warned Hamlet to not hurt her in any way. Hamlet said, â€Å" leave alone speak daggers to her, / but use none” (Shakespeare 3. 2). This indicated Hamlet’s protection to his mother.\r\nHe spoke to her in an abrupt greenback at times, but never physically treated her in any such(prenominal) way. Hamlet didn’t want to kill Claudius because he didn’t want to see his mother suffer a redness of another get it ond one. Sigmund Freud, a prominent scholar, goes deeper than this, and explains the situation as, â€Å"Oedipus Complex. ” Freud explains that Hamlet is in love with his mother. In Shakespearean time, incest was not publically acceptable. Claudius was the yet person that was forcing Hamlet to not have sexual relations with his mother.\r\nHamlet, in his subconscious mind, had a desire to do exactly what his uncle had done; that is, get exempt of the husband so that he can have Gertrude for himself. If that is true, Hamlet cannot act because he is fighting against his subconscious; he knows he wants something that is entirely evil, and if he were to go finished with it, he would be no break up than Claudius. Freud continues this analogy with the fact that Hamlet is only able to kill Claudius at the block off of the play, because his mother has just died. Therefore, Claudius serves no barely purpose, and Hamlet can complete his revenge.\r\nThroughout the play, it is quite evident that Hamlet’s tragic flaw is his procrastination in the avenging of his father’s death. Most scholars slope to agree with the fact that the, â€Å"Oedipus Complex,” seems to be most logical in the explanation of his procrastination; still, some critics believe that Hamlet patently thinks too much. He wants the murder of the King to be perfect. Claudius has to go to hell. The people have to know about the murderer Claudius. Hamlet spends too much time cookery and not enough time doing; thus, devising the King’s murder more complicated than other murders he has orchestrated.\r\nThis procrastination is ultimately responsible for the deaths of most study characters, and the entire outcome of the play. Had Hamlet enacted his revenge at the beginning of the play, the play as a whole would have been un-existent. non until everybody is dying, including himself, does he realize that he should not have waited so long. He understands the consequences of his delay, and all of his pent-up rage explodes, and he murders the King; getting the revenge he was after from the beginning. It seems at this point, however, that it is no revenge at all, but simply the last tragic mistake of lifeless indecision.\r\nWorks Cited\r\nN.A. â€Å"why does Hamlet delay the Revenge.” http://www.bookrags.com/essay 2005/11/27/135143/31. Book Rags, 2006. Web. Nov. 2, 2011.\r\nN.A. â€Å"Hamlet.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet. Wikipedia, Nov. 2, 20 01. Web. Nov. 2, 2011.\r\n'