Causing the Civil War

urban vs. Rural, Factory vs. Farm. The substitution story told in text handwritings is that the industrial revolution, line of descent with the first stuff mill in new(a) England in the 1790s, created an economy that did not need hard workers. southwesterners, however, act to use buckle down labor on their farms because agriculture was profitable. about related to this change, cities uprise as nation centers in the northbound created an urban association charm the South remained primarily agrarian. \n number entropy on farms and cities, however, reveals that while cities grew chop-chop in the uniting amidst 1800 and 1860, they did not sound jumper lead people centers until 1920, 60 eld by and by the urbane struggle began. In 1860, on that point were much(prenominal) farms in the North than in the South, although Southern states, oddly in the cotton wool Belt, had the major(ip)ity of life-sized farms (1,000 acres or more). Census selective information on farms and cities, however, reveals that while cities grew rapidly in the North between 1800 and 1860, they did not become leading population centers until 1920, 60 years after the Civil War began. \nThe fantasy that there were no southern cities was in like manner a myth. The U.S. had cardinal cities with more than 150,000 residents in 1860 and three of themSt. Louis, Baltimore and peeled Orleanswere in slave states. Several otherwise southern cities, such(prenominal) as Louisville, Mobile, and Charleston, had more than 20,000 residents each and were listed among the largest urban places in the U.S. \nSimilarly, data demonstrate the heading of manufacturing in the South. Richmond, VA, had mill about and factories as beforehand(predicate) as 1800. The 1860 count shows the fairly even off spread of manufacturing crossways the states, with only New York and Pennsylvania save 17,000 or more manufacturing establishments (see Primary inception Farms Census info [1860], List of urban Areas [1860], and Manufacturing Census Date). like and Slavery. Cotton is magnate! bellowed James Hammond, a U.S. Senator from South Carolina, in 1859, reminding all of the richness of cotton in the South. A major error in the agricultural vs. industrial revolution theme, however, utter in book after book, is that thralldom existed to produce cotton.